Comments for apaku

Comment on Don’t install Ubuntu 9.10 if you want a stable KDevelop by apaku

apaku — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:24:29 +0000

Well, people installing a beta from “experimental” or building themselves from sources are not the problem. Those people usually are able to update to the next beta if I tell them in the bugreport its been fixed already. But shipping such a beta in a stable release just means that I’m getting the same old bugreports for ages (I just again closed two with the cmake-createcontext problem). I’m actually just glad that this is not a long-term-support release of ubuntu, that would’ve been a catastrophy.

Comment on Don’t install Ubuntu 9.10 if you want a stable KDevelop by Mate

Mate — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:10:10 +0000

I actually compiled Beta5 on Debian, and sent (a seemingly duplicate) bugreport with full trace. For the full trace, I actually had to install the -dev packages, which necessitated a resizing and repartitioning of my harddrive. I know these duplicate bugreports must be frustrating to you, but it took me 2-3 hours to get that full trace… I know that there are people hitting “send” on every DrKonqi bugreport, but this is not always the case. Anyway, compiling SVN now, as you said the bug has been fixed! Yay!

Comment on Don’t install Ubuntu 9.10 if you want a stable KDevelop by Mahdi

Mahdi — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:37:18 +0000

Thank you. I was fed-up with kdevelop4 crashes.

Comment on KDevelop4 moved by Esben Mose Hansen

Esben Mose Hansen — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:41:40 +0000

Mercurial users can use mercurical against a git repository, so moving to git gives us both. (But I wouldn’t recommend mercurial; it is more comfortable for svn users at first, but is severely lacking in features compared to git).

Comment on KDevelop4 moved by Valentyn

Valentyn — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:31:09 +0000

Better than nothing:) Only.
KDE is moving to git, not to many different DVCSs.

Comment on Don’t install Ubuntu 9.10 if you want a stable KDevelop by rild

rild — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:27:30 +0000

Here you can find steps how to replace kdevelop4 with kdevelop3 on ubuntu 9.10
http://www3.elphel.com/wiki/kdevelop

Comment on KDevelop4 moved by John

John — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:22:59 +0000

of course because mercurial is better.

Comment on KDevelop4 moved by apaku

apaku — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:07:55 +0000

Because doing the move in svn is a lot easier than moving to gitorious. We’re still planning to concentrate on the release, taking one step at a time is better than trying to take two and then falling over

That said we all pretty much agree that git will be the next move after the 4.0 release.

Comment on KDevelop4 moved by Tom

Tom — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:42:10 +0000

Why don’t move to gitorious? (The Amarokers say it’s greater than sliced bread.)

Comment on Don’t install Ubuntu 9.10 if you want a stable KDevelop by Daniel

Daniel — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:34:20 +0000

And now to atonement, I’ll post links to where you can get the previous binary packages

https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/amd64/kdevelop-data/4:3.5.4-1ubuntu1
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/amd64/kdevelop/4:3.5.4-1ubuntu1

Be sure you get the old kdevelop-data as well, otherwise it’s kinda (doesn’t install . Also, these are for amd64 (or 64-bit Intel, just not ia64), for other archs, go to:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/kdevelop/4:3.5.4-1ubuntu1